[IMPORTANT: Make this 4 times longer with much more detail]
Report U.S. Delegation Visits Greenland Amid Trump Pressure Campaign Vice President J.D. Vance is the highest-ranking U.S. official to ever travel to the island. By Christina Lu , an energy and environment reporter at Foreign Policy . U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance (center) and second lady Usha Vance pose with personnel at the U.S. military’s Pituffik Space Base in Pituffik, Greenland, on March 28. U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance (center) and second lady Usha Vance pose with personnel at the U.S. military’s Pituffik Space Base in Pituffik, Greenland, on March 28. Jim Watson/ Getty Images My FP: Follow topics and authors to get straight to what you like. Exclusively for FP subscribers. Subscribe Now | Log In U.S. Foreign Policy Security United States Christina Lu March 28, 2025, 2:44 PM Comment icon View Comments ( 2 ) U.S. President Donald Trump’s yearslong obsession with acquiring Greenland sparked fresh and intense backlash this week as he sent a high-profile delegation of top U.S. officials to the island—even as Greenland made clear they weren’t welcome . Trump’s Second Term Ongoing reports and analysis After days of heightened tensions between Washington and Greenland, Vice President J.D. Vance, second lady Usha Vance, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Republican Sen. Mike Lee touched down on the island on Friday to visit the only U.S. military base there, known as Pituffik Space Base. U.S. President Donald Trump’s yearslong obsession with acquiring Greenland sparked fresh and intense backlash this week as he sent a high-profile delegation of top U.S. officials to the island—even as Greenland made clear they weren’t welcome . Trending Articles Why Republicans Hate the Department of Education Broad popular support means that even Ronald Reagan failed at dismantling the agency. Powered By Advertisement Why Republicans Hate the Department of Education X Trump’s Second Term Ongoing reports and analysis After days of heightened tensions between Washington and Greenland, Vice President J.D. Vance, second lady Usha Vance, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Republican Sen. Mike Lee touched down on the island on Friday to visit the only U.S. military base there, known as Pituffik Space Base. “It’s a very high-level visit,” said Rebecca Pincus, the director of the Polar Institute at the Wilson Center. “That’s an indication that Greenland is up on the policy agenda.” But no matter how eager Trump is to acquire Greenland, its political leaders have repeatedly insisted that the island—a semiautonomous territory of Denmark—is not for sale. That friction took center stage this week as Greenlanders balked at news of the trip, with the island’s outgoing prime minister, Mute Bourup Egede, saying that the fact that Waltz is part of the delegation proves the trip is not a “harmless visit by a politician’s wife.” “ Because what is the security advisor doing in Greenland? The only purpose is to show a demonstration of power to us, and the signal is not to be misunderstood ,” Egede said in an interview with Greenlandic newspaper Sermitsiaq . Ultimately, Friday’s itinerary is a dramatically scaled-back version of the White House’s initial plan, reflecting the island’s fierce pushback against the Trump administration’s increasingly aggressive bid to take the strategically situated and mineral-rich territory. At first, Vice President Vance was not included in the U.S. delegation, which was slated to “visit historic sites” and “learn about Greenlandic heritage,” including attending Greenland’s national dogsled race . Then after Vance announced that he would also join the trip—an announcement that sparked opposition and made him the highest-ranking U.S. official to ever travel to the island—U.S. officials confirmed on Wednesday an itinerary change that would shorten the three-day trip to a one-day visit to only Pituffik. The move was welcomed by Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, who suggested that it was a sign that Washington was “ de-escalating .” “I actually think it is very positive that the Americans are canceling their visit to the Greenlandic community,” he told Danish broadcaster DR. “Then they will instead make a visit to their own base, Pituffik, and we have nothing against that.” Yet, even with this shift in plans, Trump only appears to be ramping up his rhetorical pressure campaign against the island. “We’ll go as far as we have to go. We need Greenland,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office this week. “We’ll see what happens. But if we don’t have Greenland, we can’t have great international security.” Read More A collage illustration shows a red measuring tape lassoing Greenland How Big Does Donald Trump Think Greenland Is? Map projections may be key to understand a presidential obsession. Analysis | Nick Danforth In the foreground are about half a dozen small buildings close to the shore of an ocean bay. Several of the buildings are painted blue or green, but most of the paint is weather-faded from the elements. Out beyond the bay, a pale white iceberg larger than all the buildings combined floats on the water. Why Is Trump So Obsessed With Greenland? The Arctic territory has long captured the attention of U.S. leaders. Explainer | Christina Lu The container ship Gunde Maersk sits docked at the Port of Oakland on June 24, 2024 in Oakland, California. How Denmark Can Hit Back Against Trump on Greenland The White House is threatening a close ally with a trade war or worse—but Copenhagen has leverage that could inflict instant pain on the U.S. economy. Argument | Elisabeth Braw And it’s not just Greenland and Denmark that are taking the U.S. president’s comments seriously. On Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said it would be a “profound mistake” to treat Trump’s Greenland threats as “preposterous talk.” “The United States has serious plans regarding Greenland,” he said . “These plans have long historical roots, as I have just mentioned, and it is obvious that the United States will continue to consistently advance its geostrategic, military-political, and economic interests in the Arctic.” Sign up for Editors’ Picks A curated selection of FP’s must-read stories. Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time. Enter your email Sign Up ✓ Signed Up You’re on the list! More ways to stay updated on global news: FP Live Enter your email Sign Up ✓ Signed Up World Brief Enter your email Sign Up ✓ Signed Up China Brief Enter your email Sign Up ✓ Signed Up South Asia Brief Enter your email Sign Up ✓ Signed Up Situation Report Enter your email Sign Up ✓ Signed Up View All Newsletters Indeed, Trump’s is not the first U.S. administration to eye Greenland. The island has been on U.S. officials’ minds for its strategic location in the Arctic and natural resources at least as far back as the 1860s, though no one has taken as confrontational an approach to seizing the island against its will. Trump has previously refused to rule out resorting to military force to acquire Greenland. “There’s an underlying truth to why Greenland [and] the Arctic are becoming more important—because the ice is melting, there are resources there,” said Malte Humpert, the founder of the Arctic Institute. “A region that was previously inaccessible is now becoming the playground of great-power politics, so to speak.” Much of the U.S. interest in Greenland’s natural resources has revolved around critical minerals and rare earths , which have featured heavily in Trump’s chaotic foreign-policy moves in his first few months in office. U.S. lawmakers in particular have been fixated on Greenland’s potential for rare earths —a set of 17 elements that are not actually that rare but underpin technology from Lockheed Martin’s F-35 fighter jets to wind turbines. China commands the processing and refining supply chains for many of the world’s critical minerals, and especially rare earths, in a dominance that has alarmed Washington and sparked a race to diversify away from Beijing’s grip. “Greenland sits atop vast reserves of rare-earth elements,” Republican Sen. Ted Cruz said in February . “If the U.S. were to gain access to Greenland’s resources, it could significantly reduce our dependence on foreign suppliers, particularly China, which currently operates a virtual monopoly on the rare-earth market.” But tapping Greenland’s natural resources won’t be so easy , even if the Trump administration and the island did strike some kind of agreement. While Greenland has reserves of rare earths, they are smaller than those in China, Brazil, Vietnam, India, Australia, and even the United States, according to Bloomberg . Greenland’s location in the Arctic would also complicate any efforts to mine, which is already an expensive and lengthy process, and it’s unclear if the economics of such operations would pay off. “It’s a decadal-long process to create a viable mining sector anywhere, and Greenland, of course, has the added difficulty that it’s Arctic,” which makes mining more challenging, said Morgan Bazilian, the director of the Payne Institute at the Colorado School of Mines. Mining is just one piece of the puzzle, too; engineering new supply chains requires a whole host of refining and processing capabilities. “Even if there is mining, then again, the processing question comes into play,” Bazilian said. In the midst of Trump’s threats, Greenlandic lawmakers on Thursday agreed to form a new coalition government that will become formalized with an agreement on Friday. The island on Friday also swore in its new center-right prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, who called for political unity . “At a time when we as a people are under pressure, we must stand together,” Nielsen said . This post is part of FP’s ongoing coverage of the Trump administration . Follow along here . Christina Lu is an energy and environment reporter at Foreign Policy . X: @christinafei Read More On Denmark | Greenland | Natural Resources | Security | U.S. Foreign Policy | United States Join the Conversation Commenting on this and other recent articles is just one benefit of a Foreign Policy subscription. Already a subscriber? Log In . Subscribe Subscribe View 2 Comments Join the Conversation Join the conversation on this and other recent Foreign Policy articles when you subscribe now. Subscribe Subscribe Not your account? Log out View 2 Comments Join the Conversation Please follow our comment guidelines , stay on topic, and be civil, courteous, and respectful of others’ beliefs. You are commenting as . Change your username | Log out Change your username: Username I agree to abide by FP’s comment guidelines . (Required) Confirm CANCEL Confirm your username to get started. The default username below has been generated using the first name and last initial on your FP subscriber account. Usernames may be updated at any time and must not contain inappropriate or offensive language. Username I agree to abide by FP’s comment guidelines . (Required) Confirm
