Australia’s defense policy has long relied on great powers, from the UK to the US. However, Albert Palazzo challenges this status quo in his thought-provoking analysis. He suggests that Australia could revolutionize its security strategy by embracing a strategic defensive approach.
“By adopting a different military philosophy as the guide for its security decision-making, Australia could manage its security largely on its own,”
Palazzo argues that instead of continuing to deepen reliance on alliances like Aukus, which involves acquiring nuclear-powered submarines from the US, Australia should explore alternative paths towards a robust and independent national defense policy.
In his upcoming book, “The Big Fix: Rebuilding Australia’s National Security,” Palazzo introduces the concept of the “strategic defensive.” This strategic framework focuses on denying aggressors their objectives rather than defeating them outright—a strategy well-suited for nations like Australia that aim to maintain the status quo without engaging in aggression.
“Defence is the naturally stronger position in war, compared to attack.”
Palazzo emphasizes that being on the defensive offers inherent advantages in warfare. It is more challenging for attackers to capture territory than for defenders to hold it, especially given Australia’s unique geographical isolation and vast maritime borders. By leveraging advanced technologies like long-range strike missiles and drones integrated with sophisticated sensor networks, Australia can establish a formidable defense perimeter at a fraction of the cost of conventional naval assets.
Moreover,
“Missiles and drones are vastly cheaper…and most importantly, they are available now.”
Investing heavily in these capabilities not only enhances national security but also aligns with modern trends favoring unmanned systems over traditional crewed vessels.
Palazzo criticizes current defense plans centered around expensive platforms like nuclear submarines as outdated and unsustainable. He advocates for a shift towards mass-producing cost-effective weapons systems rather than investing in limited high-value assets vulnerable to evolving threats.
“Australia has decided to intensify dependence on the US… But it’s not too late to rethink.”
While Australian leaders have leaned towards reinforcing ties with the US through initiatives like Aukus, Palazzo posits that there is still an opportunity to recalibrate national security strategies. By reimagining military doctrines and prioritizing self-reliance over foreign entanglements, Australia can chart a more sovereign course in safeguarding its interests.
In conclusion,
“By adopting a different military philosophy…Australia could manage its security largely on its own.”
Albert Palazzo underscores the need for bold leadership willing to challenge conventional wisdom and steer Australia towards a future where strategic independence reigns supreme.
Leave feedback about this